Teaching Series 1 - About the Bible
Part 5: Location Is Everything
thought about beginning this article
by saying," Even as I write this, the Middle East is in crisis."
But I think that it would be more accurate for me to tell you that the
Middle East has always been in crisis. Having said this, we can
now examine why it is so.
The first factor in understanding the geography of the Bible is to
understand that the first recognizable civilizations (the ones that
left records that we could trace) were founded next to the great
rivers. The oldest evidence comes from the confluence of the
Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, a channel that is now known as the Shat
Al-Arab, and back upstream on both rivers. The next oldest
evidence comes from the Nile River valley. These two areas form
the eastern and western borders of the "Fertile Crescent." Both ends of
the crescent are the places that tribes of people would travel to
during times of draught and famine. In better times, both areas
would be prosperous enough to make it possible for people to express
their beliefs in concrete forms; scrolls, pyramids, communal buildings
and meeting places.
The middle areas of the Fertile Crescent included the valleys formed by
the smaller rivers. While the Jordan River is the best known of
these, there are other small rivers that sustained communities such as
the Yarmuk, Jabbok, Arnon, and Zered Rivers which are western
tributaries of the Jordan and the Dead Sea, and the Kishon and Orontes
Rivers which flow west into the Mediterranean Sea.
It is significant that while the names of countries and cities change
with the empires that move in and out, the names of the rivers stay the
same.
The second factor in understanding the geography of the Bible is to
note that this small strip of land is the land bridge to the continents
of Africa, Europe, and Asia. To control who could travel through
a place the size of the state of New Jersey was to control wealth and
trade. Add to this the technology to dig tunnels and wells that
open into protected heights of land buttressed by stone walls and
earthworks, and a city such as Hazor or Megiddo (Har Megiddo,
"Armageddon") could successfully survive a siege. In the southern
reaches of what was first called Canaan, the city of Beersheba was
known as an oasis for the nomadic tribes that traveled the desert then
and still do today. In fact, the Bedouin of the southern desert
today are loyal to the people of Abraham because they believe that he
was first a desert nomad.
The third factor is to understand the geographic language of the
Bible. Distance is measured by the number of days it took to walk
from one place to another. Abraham's journey to Mount Moriah to
sacrifice Isaac was three days, one way. And it is important not
to confuse Hollywood with the Bible. The movie "The Bible" has
Abraham and Isaac traveling from Beersheba to Mount Moriah by walking
through the devastated city of Sodom. The best scholarship today
places Sodom and Gomorrah on the opposite side of the Dead Sea, across
from Beersheba. Something of a major detour, I think.
"Up" and "down" refer to elevation, not direction. People are
characterized as going down to Jericho and up to Jerusalem.
Jericho is actually east-northeast of Jerusalem, but Jericho is about
1300 feet below sea level (the lowest city on earth) and Jerusalem sits
atop a mountain ridge. The cardinal points of direction (north,
south, east, and west) are referred to accurately in the Bible.
When you view a map of the Middle East, please note that all
standardized maps orient the top of the map page with the direction
north.
Many study bibles include some maps of the Middle East. They are
primarily maps that show the political divisions during different times
in history. Some of the places that are named on ancient maps are
known today, but some are not. Cities that were destroyed in one
period may not have been rebuilt because those conquerors saw no
strategic value in maintaining the place. It was not until the
nineteenth century that many of those cities were even searched for,
and the debates on which ruins are which city continue to this
day. One example of this discussion is the city of Ur, the
ancestral home of Abraham. There are three locations that make
that claim, one in southern Iraq and two in northern Iraq.
There are also atlases and individual maps that show other important
data, such as topographic maps and even weather maps.
Understanding the different elevations and the normal weather patterns
for different parts of the area can help us understand where people
were able to live. These maps are also useful in understanding
how the biblical generals made strategic decisions about warfare.
Some places in the bible are not
even recognized by many people as places. Ebenezer, which means
"stone of help" is a battleground referred to in 1Samuel, three times.
Other places have modern names that do not help us understand the
history without a little literary digging. The people of the
modern occupied territories of Israel call themselves
Palestinians. When the Romans destroyed Judah and Samaria, which
they had earlier named Judea and Samaria, they further insulted the
Jews by renaming the whole place Palestine. "Palestine" is
Philistine in Latin. To rename the Promised Land after the most
dangerous of the enemies of the Jews is a terrible insult. In
reality, the people of the Promised Land before the Jews were primarily
Canaanites. The people of the Gaza strip are really ancient
Philistines. (Gaza is the name of one of the most prominent cities of
that small piece of land. Israel has only conquered it once [King
David] and has never occupied it. The people of Lebanon are
ancient Phoenicians.The people of Syria are ancient Hittites,
Assyrians, and Syrians. The people of Iraq and Iran are ancient
Medo-Persians. The original people of Jordan were Ammonites,
Moabites, and Edomites. The current Jordanian kingdom is none of
these. The Jordanian monarchs are Hashemites, cousins to the
princes of Saudi Arabia and put in place by the British and French at
the end of World War I. Most of Kuwait was filled in slowly by
the rivers over the last three millennia. It simply wasn't there
in ancient times.

I guess the point I'm trying to make
is that when we compare the Biblical and modern landscapes we find that
the names change but the battles don't. In fact, the Bible tells
us that the battle will continue until the end of
time. In Judges 1 and 2, we are told that because the
Israelites did not remove the original people from the land, that those
people would not be removed by God. Those people would become a
thorn in the side of the Israelites for all time. Only God will
fix the problem permanently. In the meantime, the rest of us have
lots of work to do. We still have to show the whole world what
living in the Kingdom of God looks like.
Next time: About the Bible - What's In A Name?
To God be the glory,
Jude Moore,
judemoore7@aol.com
|