Teaching Series 1 - About the Bible
Part 4: Context and Prooftext
n eye for an eye, that 's giving us permission to get revenge."
"John 3:16. That's all anyone has to know about God"
"Let women keep silent in the churches. See, Paul says so."
"God helps those who help themselves."
One of the universal issues that we
encounter today is the misuse of the Bible to make a particular
point. This method of debate is known as "prooftexting," pulling
together a series of verses or half-verses to win an
argument. The problem is that since the Bible was written with
the words and phrases in the order that we find them, it is dangerous
to rearrange that order to suit our individual needs. This is not
to say that we cannot meditate on single phrases or thoughts from the
Bible, but it is to say that we do not do the Bible justice when we
shout phrases at one another in an argument, or write down lists of
verses in an attempt to connect them for a single purpose.

The first successful use of God's
words to win a fight can be found in the Book of Genesis, chapter
3. The serpent confuses the woman regarding the meaning of the
warning from God about death and the tree in the middle of the garden.
It is very important that we
understand the context in which a particular idea is revealed to us in
the Bible. When we talk of context, we are talking about
understanding the greater message of the paragraph, prayer, book, or
letter in which the idea exists. We are also talking about
understanding the culture and circumstances in which the idea was
written. Let's look at the four examples above.
"An eye for an eye." is found in the
19th chapter of the Book of Deuteronomy and is part of a list of laws
regarding testimony. Specifically, this list is designed to
assure that no one shall be accused unjustly, that all accusations will
be investigated completely, and that the punishment does not exceed the
crime. In those days, a petty crime for which the victim sought
justice would result in the victim's family exacting that justice by
punishing as many members of the perpetrator's family as could be
found. As you can well imagine, this kind of thing got out of
hand pretty quickly, leading to blood feuds that could go on for
generations. The purpose of these laws was to limit the amount of
punishment, not to require at least that amount of punishment.
When we hear of the modern day Moslem nations that apply this kind of
law to the extent that a thief will have his hands chopped off, we
think of this as barbaric. Think about how much worse if would be
if everyone in an extended family had to pay for the crime of one
person.
John 3:16. This verse is seen being held up on posters in large
crowds and has become a standard of Christian evangelism. The
idea is that if you know the words in this verse, then you are part of
the "in" crowd, and if you don't know these words, someone who does can
engage you in conversation about the Good News. These are the
words:
"For God so loved the world,
that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should
not perish, but have eternal life."
Here is the issue: this is one
holy promise taken from the teaching of Jesus to Nicodemus about the
new birth in Him. The entire statement quoted in the Book of John
gives us not only the promise of eternal life, but of life in the
Kingdom here on earth, the manner in which Jesus will pay for our sins,
and the promise of eternal salvation. Personally, I am more
persuaded by the promise of eternal salvation than I am by the promise
of eternal life. I also can come to know and love Jesus all the
more by knowing that He knew what He would have to do to buy us eternal
salvation. I have seen and heard the phrase John 3:16
parodied; I have heard it hurled as a threat. I am sure that it
would be much more difficult to quote the entire teaching of Jesus in
the middle of an argument. But of course it might end the
argument.
"Let the women keep silent in the
churches." The cultural context of the First Century when
Paul was writing held no place for women in any form of power, but more
than that, Paul is writing to the church at Corinth about the loose
moral behavior of the entire congregation. Some of those who
spoke out against Paul were women who did not want to lose their
influence in Corinthian society; women who were not loving members of
families but were instead engaged in sexual cultic activity in the
worship of "local" gods. If Paul had meant for this to be a
universal prohibition against the work of women in the Church, the
account of the first convert in Europe (Acts 16) would have been about
the first male convert in Europe, not Lydia, a wealthy merchant of
purple fabrics. Indeed, in 1 Corinthians 11, Paul accepts praying
and prophesying in church so long as their heads are covered, and in
Acts 2 and 21 refer to women prophets as appropriate.
"God helps those who help
themselves" is not biblical. It can be found in Poor Richard's
Almanak. Benjamin Franklin said it. Be careful to quote the
Bible when quoting the Bible.
I wish to leave you with some
thoughts given in a conference by the Reverend Doctor Mittries de
Champlain of the General Seminary: " The Bible is a compass, not
a map, it is designed to give us direction, not directions."
To God be the glory,
Jude Moore,
judemoore7@aol.com
|