Episcopal Church of the Epiphany
20 Highland Avenue
Wilbraham, MA 01095
Tel 413.596.6080 Fax 413.596.3345
Email: parish.admin@epiphanyma.org

Teaching Series 1 - About the Bible

Part 4: Context and Prooftext

an eye for an eye, that 's giving us permission to get revenge."
"John 3:16. That's all anyone has to know about God"
"Let women keep silent in the churches.  See, Paul says so."
"God helps those who help themselves."

One of the universal issues that we encounter today is the misuse of the Bible to make a particular point.  This method of debate is known as "prooftexting," pulling together a series of  verses or half-verses to win an argument.  The problem is that since the Bible was written with the words and phrases in the order that we find them, it is dangerous to rearrange that order to suit our individual needs.  This is not to say that we cannot meditate on single phrases or thoughts from the Bible, but it is to say that we do not do the Bible justice when we shout phrases at one another in an argument, or write down lists of verses in an attempt to connect them for a single purpose.  Adam and Eve

The first successful use of God's words to win a fight can be found in the Book of Genesis, chapter 3.  The serpent confuses the woman regarding the meaning of the warning from God about death and the tree in the middle of the garden.

It is very important that we understand the context in which a particular idea is revealed to us in the Bible.  When we talk of context, we are talking about understanding the greater message of the paragraph, prayer, book, or letter in which the idea exists.  We are also talking about understanding the culture and circumstances in which the idea was written.   Let's look at the four examples above. 

"An eye for an eye." is found in the 19th chapter of the Book of Deuteronomy and is part of a list of laws regarding testimony.   Specifically, this list is designed to assure that no one shall be accused unjustly, that all accusations will be investigated completely, and that the punishment does not exceed the crime.  In those days, a petty crime for which the victim sought justice would result in the victim's family exacting that justice by punishing as many members of the perpetrator's family as could be found.  As you can well imagine, this kind of thing got out of hand pretty quickly, leading to blood feuds that could go on for generations.  The purpose of these laws was to limit the amount of punishment, not to require at least that amount of punishment.  When we hear of the modern day Moslem nations that apply this kind of law to the extent that a thief will have his hands chopped off, we think of this as barbaric.  Think about how much worse if would be if everyone in an extended family had to pay for the crime of one person.
John 3:16.  This verse is seen being held up on posters in large crowds and has become a standard of Christian evangelism.  The idea is that if you know the words in this verse, then you are part of the "in" crowd, and if you don't know these words, someone who does can engage you in conversation about the Good News.  These are the words:

"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life."
Here is the issue:  this is one holy promise taken from the teaching of Jesus to Nicodemus about the new birth in Him.  The entire statement quoted in the Book of John gives us not only the promise of eternal life, but of life in the Kingdom here on earth, the manner in which Jesus will pay for our sins, and the promise of eternal salvation.  Personally, I am more persuaded by the promise of eternal salvation than I am by the promise of eternal life.  I also can come to know and love Jesus all the more by knowing that He knew what He would have to do to buy us eternal salvation.   I have seen and heard the phrase John 3:16 parodied; I have heard it hurled as a threat.  I am sure that it would be much more difficult to quote the entire teaching of Jesus in the middle of an argument.  But of course it might end the argument. 

"Let the women keep silent in the churches."   The cultural context of the First Century when Paul was writing held no place for women in any form of power, but more than that, Paul is writing to the church at Corinth about the loose moral behavior of the entire congregation.  Some of those who spoke out against Paul were women who did not want to lose their influence in Corinthian society; women who were not loving members of families but were instead engaged in sexual cultic activity in the worship of "local" gods.  If Paul had meant for this to be a universal prohibition against the work of women in the Church, the account of the first convert in Europe (Acts 16) would have been about the first male convert in Europe, not Lydia, a wealthy merchant of purple fabrics.  Indeed, in 1 Corinthians 11, Paul accepts praying and prophesying in church so long as their heads are covered, and in Acts 2 and 21 refer to women prophets as appropriate.

"God helps those who help themselves" is not biblical.  It can be found in Poor Richard's Almanak.  Benjamin Franklin said it.  Be careful to quote the Bible when quoting the Bible.
 
I wish to leave you with some thoughts given in a conference by the Reverend Doctor Mittries de Champlain of the General Seminary:  " The Bible is a compass, not a map, it is designed to give us direction, not directions."
 

To God be the glory,
Jude Moore,
judemoore7@aol.com

 

This site is empowered by Right Angle's